Lecturers' Perception of Hybrid Metacognitive-Based Instruction in Teaching Critical Listening in Indonesian Higher Education Institution
Abstract
This study explores lecturers’ perceptions of Hybrid Metacognitive-Based Instruction (HMBI) in teaching critical listening at an Indonesian higher education institution. Employing a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected from 10 lecturers through semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, and document analysis. The findings highlight the effectiveness of HMBI in fostering critical listening skills by integrating metacognitive strategies such as reflection, goal-setting, and self-regulation with hybrid tools, including podcasts and online discussions. Lecturers reported improvements in student autonomy, engagement, and analytical abilities, particularly in identifying implicit meanings and evaluating spoken content. However, challenges were identified, including technological barriers, time-intensive preparation, and initial student resistance to reflective practices. These obstacles underscore the need for institutional support, such as reliable technological infrastructure, professional development programs, and scaffolding strategies to ease the adoption of HMBI. The study emphasizes the potential of HMBI as a transformative approach to teaching critical listening, blending active learning principles with technological innovation to enhance higher-order cognitive skills. Recommendations include tailored strategies for gradual implementation and addressing digital divides to optimize its impact. The research contributes to the growing discourse on hybrid learning models and metacognitive instruction, offering practical insights for educators and institutions in diverse educational contexts.
References
Anthonysamy, L. (2021). The use of metacognitive strategies for undisrupted online learning: Preparing university students in the age of pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6881–6899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10518-y
Bülow, M. W. (2022). Designing Synchronous Hybrid Learning Spaces: Challenges and Opportunities. 135–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88520-5_9
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Creswell, J., & Guetterman, T. (2019). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 6th Edition. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Educational-Research%3A-Planning%2C-Conducting%2C-and-and-Creswell-Guetterman/00b6c995e27b3ed812e90adf0b643ea19289633e
Elmosnino, S. (2022). A Review of Literature in Critical Listening Education. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 70(5), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.17743/jaes.2022.0004
Erdemir, N., & Yeşilçınar, S. (2021). Reflective practices in micro teaching from the perspective of preservice teachers: Teacher feedback, peer feedback and self-reflection. Reflective Practice, 22(6), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2021.1968818
Falahi, S., & Chowdhury, R. (2024). SOCIAL NETWORKING SYSTEMS IN ENHANCING METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS: POST-PANDEMIC INFORMAL LEARNING AMONG IRANIAN ADULT EFL LEARNERS. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 40(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5242
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Fleming, S. M. (2024). Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis. Annual Review of Psychology, 75(1), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-022423-032425
Global Knowledge and Convergence Association, & Ahn, H. (2023). A Study on How to Apply a Model for Hybrid Learning in Korean Language Classes: Focusing on college liberal arts Intermediate Korean listening classes. Global Knowledge and Convergence Association, 6(2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.47636/gkca.2023.6.2.157
Hermita, N., Erlisnawati, E., Alim, J. A., Putra, Z. H., Mahartika, I., & Sulistiyo, U. (2024). Hybrid learning, blended learning or face-to-face learning: Which one is more effective in remediating misconception? Quality Assurance in Education, 32(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2023-0019
Jaiswal, A., Lyon, J. A., Zhang, Y., & Magana, A. J. (2021). Supporting student reflective practices through modelling-based learning assignments. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(6), 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1952164
Kimyo International University in Tashkent, Uzbekistan., & Graeme Medd, A. B. (2023). The Development and Assessment of Critical Listening Skills in the Speech Program. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 06(03). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i3-62
Li, K. C., Wong, B. T. M., Kwan, R., Chan, H. T., Wu, M. M. F., & Cheung, S. K. S. (2023). Evaluation of Hybrid Learning and Teaching Practices: The Perspective of Academics. Sustainability, 15(8), 6780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086780
Luu, V. T. M. (2021). Developing EFL learners’ listening comprehension through a computer-assisted self-regulated prosody-based listening platform. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Developing-EFL-learners%E2%80%99-listening-comprehension-a-Luu/73d6d8b08fd19e8e8858d5380f34f8b207362969
Machost, H., & Stains, M. (2023). Reflective Practices in Education: A Primer for Practitioners. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 22(2), es2. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-07-0148
Makiaway, J., Raganas, S. E., Serbo, D. N., & Acuña, A. (2024). A Glimpse of My Progress: Exploring Reflective Journaling as an Innovation to Enhance Metacognitive Skills, Motivation, and Acceptability of Learners. Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science, 1(2), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v1i2.104
Rao, I. S., Jeevan, S., & Ahmad, A. (2023). Impact of Metacognitive Strategies on Creative Writing of ESL Students at College Level in District Lahore. Global Language Review, VIII(I), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2023(VIII-I).29
Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022). Metacognitive Strategies and Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 913219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219
Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the Best of Online and Face-to-Face Learning: Hybrid and Blended Learning Approach for COVID-19, Post Vaccine, & Post-Pandemic World. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
SKC Govt, Degree College Poonch, Mushtaq, Dr. M., Iqbal, Z., & Maulana Azad National Urdu University. (2024). Hybrid Pedagogies: Assessing the Effectiveness of Blended and Flipped Learning in Digital Learning Environments. International Journal of Emerging Knowledge Studies, 03(09), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.70333/ijeks-03-09-034
Utami, A. P., Florentinus, T. S., & Ahmadi, F. (2022). The Development of E-Learning with Schoology In Hybrid Learning Strategy For Listening Skill Of Tadulako University: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211125.035
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=RxjjUefze_oC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Vygotsky%E2%80%99s+(1978)+&ots=okyXW2p06q&sig=BVcFZBXnlb4sweCZf3WR0nM55Ac
Wang, F. L., Fong, J., & Kwan, R. (2009). Handbook of Research on Hybrid Learning Models: Advanced Tools, Technologies, and Applications: Advanced Tools, Technologies, and Applications. IGI Global. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=_IQPHzzJ2vcC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=hybrid+learning+models&ots=n8cMSmqP_C&sig=f-4Vt5At64s2kS23lvRJxseMLKc
Yaseen, A. H. (2024). Iraqi EFL University students attitudes towards Self-Regulated Learning on improving Listening skill. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.33687/jhssr.003.03.0343
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Safar Nur, Muhammad Basri, Sahril Sahril
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Tamaddun journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain the copyright and grant Tamaddun the right of first publication. The work will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits others to share the work with proper acknowledgment of the authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into additional non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of their work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or including it in a book), provided that the initial publication in this journal is acknowledged.
3. Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) before and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the published work.
