Exploring The Teacher’s Roles and Practice in Promoting Students’ Engagement: A Focus on Non-English Major Students
Keywords:
ESP instruction, student engagement, teacher competencies, pProfessional development, higher education, qualitative research
Abstract
This study explores the roles and practices of an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) teacher in fostering student engagement among non-English major students in higher education. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with a teacher at Muhammadiyah University of Kendari. The findings reveal that the teacher’s effectiveness stems from a combination of pedagogical, social, and professional competencies. Strategies employed to enhance engagement include creating a warm and inclusive classroom environment, tailoring teaching methods to accommodate diverse student proficiency levels, and implementing effective time management practices. These approaches significantly improved students’ confidence, participation, and language acquisition outcomes. The study also identified challenges such as limited course duration, which restricts long-term assessment, and occasional student reluctance in group activities. To address these challenges, the teacher relied on adaptive strategies and emphasized the importance of professional development programs, such as the Inter-disciplinary Teacher Collaboration (ITC) program, which provided new insights into effective ESP instruction. The study sheds light on the importance of collaborative learning, scaffolding techniques, and tailored instruction in meeting the specific linguistic and professional needs of ESP students. This research contributes to the understanding of ESP pedagogy by offering practical and theoretical insights into effective teaching practices. It highlights the critical role of teacher agency in shaping engagement and learning outcomes. The findings provide a foundation for improving ESP instruction and call for future research to explore longitudinal impacts, comparative studies, and the integration of technology in ESP classrooms.
References
Abbott-Chapman, J., K., Martin, N., Ollington, A., Venn, T., Dwyer, & S. Gall. (2014). “The
Longitudinal Association of Childhood School Engagement with Adult Educational and
Occupational Achievement: Findings from an Australian National Study.” British Educational
Research Journal. 40 (1): 102–120. doi:10.1002/berj.3031
Abiodullah, M., Dur-e-Sameen, D., & Aslam. (2020). Emotional intelligence as a predictor of teacher engagement in classroom. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(1), 127–140.
achievement in kindergarten. International Journal of Contemporary Education, 2(2), 61.
achievement motivation on students’ writing competency. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia, 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v1i0.808
Adekunle, M. (1995). English in Nigeria: Attitudes, policy and communicative realities. Bamgbose et Al (Eds.) New English: A West African Perspective Ibadan: Mosuro Publishers and Book Sellers.
Aelterman, N., M., Vansteenkiste, H., Van Keer, L., Van den Berghe, J., De Meyer, & L. Haerens. (2012). “Students’ Objectively Measured Physical Activity Levels and Engagement as a Function of Between-class and Between-student Differences in Motivation toward Physical Education.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34 (4): 457–480. doi:10.1123/jsep.34.4.457.
Ajideh, P. (2009). Autonomous Learning and Metacognitive Strategies in ESP Class.
Alghamdi, A., H. (2022). Factors affecting teaching methods among academicians in al-baha university, saudi arabia. Egyptian Journal of Educational Sciences. 2(1).
Alhirtani, N., A., K. (2020). The Use of Modern Teaching Methods in Teaching the Arabic Language at Higher Education Phase from the Point View of Arabic Language Professors--A Case of a
Ali, M., M., & Hassan, N. (2018). Defining concepts of student engagement and factors contributing to their engagement in schools. Creative Education, 9, 2161-2170. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.914157.
Anderson, A., R., Christenson, S., L., Sinclair, M., F., & Lehr, C., A. (2004). Check & connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 95–113. doi: 10.1016/j. jsp.2004.01.002
Andryani, R., Iryanah., Firdaus, I., & Maliki, B., I. (2024). Efektivitas pelatihan dan pengembangan guru dalam mencapai tujuan pendidikan yang unggul. Journal on Education, 6(3), 15851- 15862.
Anthony, L. (2018). Introducing English for specific purposes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.7251
Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. (2009). Adolescent behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: Relationship to dropout. Journal of School Health, 79(9), 408-415; 415.
Archambault, I., M. Janosz, J. Fallu, and L. Pagani. 2009. “Student Engagement and Its
Relationship with Early High School Dropout.” Journal of Adolescence. 32 (3): 651–670.
doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007
Ardila, Y., P., & Rigianti, H., A. (2023). Peran Penting dan Tantangan yang di Hadapi oleh Guru Profesional dalam Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar di Kelas. Jurnal Handayani. 14(1), 162-183.
Ayeni, A., J. (2011). Teachers’ professional development and quality assurance in Nigerian Secondary Schools, World Journal of Education, 12:143-149.
Basri, M., D. (2016). Fundamentals of Language Research Methodology. Jakarta Pusat: Gunadarma Ilmu Publisher. behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement among three school-age Student
Biggs, J. (2012). “What the Student Does: Teaching for Enhanced Learning.” Higher Education
Research and Development, 31(1), 39–55. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.642839.
Bondie, R., S., Dahnke, C., & Zusho, A. (2019). How does changing “One-Size-Fits-All” to
Brown, A., Lawrence, J., Basson, M., & Redmond, P. (2022). A conceptual framework to enhance student online learning and engagement in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1860912
Burić, I., & Macuka, I. (2018). Self-efficacy, emotions and work engagement among teachers: A two wave cross-lagged analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(7), 1917–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9903-9
Butler, Y., G., & Iino, M. (2005). Current Japanese reforms in English language education: The 2003 “action plan.” Language Policy, 4(1), 25–45.
CASPERSEN, J., DE LANGE, T., PRØITZ, T. S., SOLBREKKE, T. D. & STENSAKER, B. (2011) Learning about
Christenson, S., L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer Science & Business Media.
Christenson, S., L., Reschly, A., L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on
Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education: University
cohorts. Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning, 4(13), 52-62.
Collie, R., J., Martin, A., J., Papworth, B., & Ginns, P. (2016). Students’ interpersonal relationships, personal best (PB) goals, and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 65–76.
Collins, J., A. (2014). Student engagement in today’s learning environment: Engaging the
connections. New York: Routledge.
Conner, T. (2011). Academic engagement ratings and instructional preferences: Comparing
Da Luz, F., S. (2015). The relationship between teachers and students in the classroom: communicative language teaching approach and cooperative learning strategy to improve learning (Master’s Thesis). Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, United States.
Dacholfany, M., I., Nasar, I., Zulfikar, M. R., Machsunah, Y. C., Wahyuningsih, D., & Sitopu, J. W. (2023). Program Pelatihan Guru Lintas Provinsi dalam Peningkatan (3rd ed.). ASCD.
(University of Oslo, Oslo). 2847-2856.3(9), 1693–1708. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v3i9.871 362. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X188211304(6), 4613-4618.
Den Brok, P., T., Bergen, R., J., Stahl, & Brekelmans, M. (2004). “Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Control Behaviours.” Learning and Instruction. 14(4): 425–443. doi:10.1016/j. learninstruc.2004.01.004
DeVito, M. (2016). Factors Influencing Student Engagement. Unpublished Certificate of Advanced Study Thesis, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/edl/11
differences of efl students. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching,
differentiated instruction affect teaching? Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 336-
Differentiated instruction in teaching English at Junior High School. Eduvest (Printed),
Dixson, M., D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1-13
Djamarah, & Zain, (2010). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Djamarah, Bahri, S. (1996). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineka C
Douglass, J., A., Thomson, G., & Zhao, C.-M. (2012). The learning outcomes race: the value of self-
Dudley-Evans, T. & ST. Jhons, M. J. (1998) Developments in English for Specific Purposes, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Echevarria, J., Short, D., & Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 195–211.
Education.
Education. EDU RESEARCH, 4(3), 144-156
ELF Annual Research Journal, 21(May), 130–153. https://www.academia.edu/download/62624248/ELF-Differentiated_Instructions20200331-37436-1ojowen.pdf.
Eliza, D., Sriandila, R., Fitri, D., A., N., & Yenti, S. (2022). Membangun guru yang profesional melalui pengembangan profesionalisme puru dalam penerapan profesinya. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 5362-5369. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2878
Emma, J., Vermeulen, E., J., & Volman, M., L., L. (2024). Promoting Student Engagement in Online Education: Online Learning Experiences of Dutch University Stude. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2(9), 941–961.
Fakry Gaffar, M. (2017). Guru Sebagai Profesi. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan UPI, 5(1), 02.
Fauziningrum, E., Sari, M., N., Rahmani, S., F., Riztya, R., Syafruni, S., & Purba, P., M. (2023). Strategies Used by English Teachers in Teaching Vocabulary. Journal on Education, 6(1), 674- 679.
Felder, R., M., & Henriques, E., R. (1995). Learning and Teaching Styles in Foreign and Second Language Education. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 21–31.
Finn, J., D., & Zimmer, K., S. (2012). Student Engagement: What Is It? Why Does It Matter? In S. L. C. et Al. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Fitria, H. (2018). The influence of organizational culture and trust through the teacher performance in
Franchisca, S., Sari, M., N., Nurfitri, Nelloe, M., K., Mulyapradana, A., & Fitriani, N. (2024). The Impact of Motivation on Foreign Language Learning: A Longitudinal Study. Journal on Education. 6(2), 11082-11093.
Franklin, C., Harris, M., B., & Allen-Meares, P. (2013). The school services sourcebook: A
Fredericks, J., A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M., A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
Fredricks, J., A., Blumenfeld, P., C., & Paris, A., H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gallup, Inc. (2013). U.S. overall: Gallup student poll results. 1-6.
Goldspink, C., Winter, P., & Foster, M. (2008). Student engagement and quality pedagogy.
Gonçalves, L., L, Parker, M., Luguetti, C., & Carbinatto, M. (2020). The facilitator’s role in supporting physical education teachers’ empowerment in a professional learning community. Sport, Education and Society, 27(3):272–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1825371
Good, T. (1983). Classroom research: A decade of progress. Educational Psychologist. 18, 127-144.
Gray, J., A., & DiLoreto. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. NCPEA International Journal of Education Leadership Preparation. 11(1), 1-20.
Green, L., & Collett, K. (2021). Teaching thinking in South African schools : Selected school leaders’ perceptions. South African Journal of Education, 41(2):Art. #1893, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v41n2a1893
Gualbertus, E., Nyoman, P. N., & Made, R. (2013). The effect of differentiated instruction and
guide for school-based professionals (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. BRILL.
https://doi.org/10.11114/ijce.v2i2.4479.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987) English for Specific Purpose, ALearning Centred Approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
indonesia. Al-Hikmah (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pendidikan Agama Islam), 3(2), 194-202.
International Education Studies, 8(9), 107-112. Retrieved from http://210.48.222.80/proxy.pac/scholarly-journals/comparison-between-effect-cooperative-learning/docview/1773226319/se-2?accountid=44024
Islam, M. (2014). The differences and similarities between English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and English for General Purposes (EGP) teachers. Journal of Research (Humanities), 68, 67-75.
Ismail, S. (2019). Impact of differentiated instruction on the writing process of ESL learners.
Issues in Language Planning, 22(1-2), 199-224. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741209
Jang, H., E. Kim, and J. Reeve. 2016. “Why Students Become More Engaged or More Disengaged
during the Semester: A Self-determination Theory Dual-process Model.” Learning and
Instruction. 43: 27–38. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002.
Jiang, Y., L. (2021). POA lilun guanzhao xia daxue yingyu ketang ruhe tigao xuesheng canyudu de yanjiu [A study on how to improve student engagement in college English classroom from the perspective of POA theory]. In Lianghua jiaoxue moshi zai yingyongxing daxue rencai peiyang zhong de tan jiu he shijian zhuanti lunwenji [Exploration and practice of the 'integration of two disciplines' teaching Model in talent cultivation of applied universities: Collection of dpecial papers] (pp. 74- 77). Beijing: Běijīng Kējì Dàxué Tiānjīn Xuéyuàn. http://doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2021.044679
Kotob, M., & Arnouss, D. (2019). Differentiated instruction: The effect on learner’s.
Krismiyati, K., & Yulia, H. (2022). The relationship between student engagement and their perception of success in online learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 29(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v29i1.53966
KUALITAS PEMBELAJARAN. Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian
Kuh, G., D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
Kuh, G., D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research. 141(1), 5-20.
Le, M., D., Nguyen, H., T. M., & Burns, A. (2021). English Primary Teacher Agency in Implementing Teaching Methods in Response to Language Policy Reform: A Vietnamese Case Study. Current
Literature and Linguistics, 6(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v6i2.9941
Liu, J., C. (2020). Yingyongxing benke yuanxiao daxue yingyu siji tongguolv tisheng celue tanxi: Yi Guangdong Dongruan Xueyuan dianzi shangwu zhuanye weili [Analysis of strategies for improving the pass rate of college English CET-4 in applied undergraduate Institutions: A case study of the e-commerce major at Donghua University, Guangdong]. Journal of Hunan Mass Media Vocational and Technical College. 20(2), 109–112. http://doi.org/10.16261/j.cnki.cn43- 1370/z.2020.02.028
Liu, M., Noordin, N., Ismail, L., & Abdrahim, N., A. (2023). Relationship between Student Engagement and Academic Achievement in College English Education for Non-English Majors in China. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 22(8), 203-2323. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.8.12
Major, C., H. (2015). Teaching online: A guide to theory, research, and practice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Mäkinen, M. (2013). Becoming engaged in inclusive practices: Narrative reflections on teaching as descriptors of teachers’ work engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.005
Martin, L. (2020). Foundations for good practice: The student experience of online learning in Australian higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). https://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/student-experience-of- online-learning-in-australian-he-during-covid-19.pdf?v=1606442611
Masyarakat, 4(2), 4513-4524.
Mertens, D., M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Miles, M., B., Huberman, A., M., & Saldana, J. C. (2021). Qualitizing data. The Routledge reviewer’s guide to mixed method analysis. 141-150.
missing catalyst of lasting instructional reform. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
Mohammadjani, F., & Tonkaboni, F. (2015). A Comparison between the Effect of Cooperative Learning Teaching Method and Lecture Teaching Method on Students' Learning and Satisfaction Level.
Murniarti, E. (2021). Analisis Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Pada Pembelajaran Daring Dimasa Pandemi Covid-19. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 1418-1427.
Murtafiah, N., H. (2022). Manajemen Pengendalian Kinerja Pendidik dalam Meningkatkan Mutu
Nguyen, T., M. Cannata, & J. Miller. (2018). “Understanding Student Behavioral Engagement:
Importance of Student Interaction with Peers and Teachers.” The Journal of Educational
Research. 111 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359.
Non-major. Dictionary Cambridge. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/non-major
of Time: An Analysis of Literature on Strategies for Teaching Simple Past Tense in Higher
Olson, A., L., & Peterson, R., L. (2015). Student Engagement, Strategy Brief. Lincoln, NE: Student Engagement Project, University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the Nebraska Department of Education. http://k12engagement.unl.edu/student-engagement
Pedler, M., Yeigh, T., & Hudson, S. (2020). The Teachers’ Role in Student Engagement: A Review. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45 (3). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n3.4
Pembelajaran Pada Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK),
Perry, K., E., Donohue, K., M., & Weinstein, R., S. (2007). “Teaching Practices and the Promotion of Achievement and Adjustment in First Grade.” Journal of School Psychology, 45 (3): 269–292. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.02.005.
Pharis, T., Wu, E., Sullivan, S., & Moore, L. (2019). Improving Teacher Quality: Professional Development Implications from Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Implementation in Rural Kentucky High Schools. Educational Research Quarterly. 42(3).
Poom-Valickis, K., Saarits, I., Sikka, H., Talts, L., & Veisson, M. (2013). Professional education of teachers’ problems and perspectives. The Estonian case. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 3:15– 23.
Prater, M. A. (1992). Increasing time-on-task in the classroom: Suggestions for improving the amount of time learners spendin on-task behaviors. Intervention in School and Clinic. 28(1), 22-27.
Prawiyogi, A., G., Sadiah, T., L., Purwanugraha, A., & Elisa, P., N. (2021). Penggunaan Media Big Book untuk Menumbuhkan Minat Baca Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicude, 5 (1), 446-452. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.787
Premier University. International Education Studies, 13(1), 32-41. Retrieved from http://210.48.222.80/proxy.pac/scholarly-journals/use-modern-teaching-methods-arabic-language-at/docview/2396851577/se-2?accountid=44024
Purnama, Y. (2022). The Use Google Translate by Islamic Education Departement Students. SINOMICS, 1(3).
Quality – perspectives on learning outcomes and their operationalisations and measurement
Quin, D. (2017). “Longitudinal and Contextual Associations between Teacher–student
Relationships and Student Engagement.” Review of Educational Research 87 (2): 345–387.
doi:10.3102/0034654316669434.
Rahayu, A., S. (2018). Engaging the students with styles in EFL perspectives. CELTIC: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature & Linguistics, 3(1), 15–29. Retrieved from https://www.education.sa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net691/f/student_engagement_and_quali ty_pedagogy.pdf?v=1457314100
Ramana, P., V., Hv, R., K., Lakshmilavanya, P., Sunalini, K., K., Pathak, P., Mallick, R., & Priya, C. (2024), The Impact Of English Language Learning Strategies On Student Success In Higher Education, Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 8557 - 8563. Doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i5.4416
reported gains in large research universities, Higher Education, 64, pp. 317–33
Research.7(7), 82-86
Risdiany, H. (2021). Pengembangan profesionalisme guru dalam mewujudkan kualitas pendidikan di.
Robinson, C., C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101-109.
Rolf, E. (2021). Teachers as designers: Analyses of pedagogical patterns and their use. PhD dissertation. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University. Available at https://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:1602928/FULLTEXT0 1.pdf. Accessed 31 December 2023.
Romijn, B. R., Slot, P. L., & Leseman, P. P. (2021). Increasing teachers’ intercultural competences in
Rothstein, J. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 175–214. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.175
Rumberger, R., W., & Lim, S., A. (2008). Why Students Drop Out of School: A Review of 25 Years of
Research. Santa Barbara: California Dropout Research Project. http://cdrp.ucsb.edu/Dropouts/
Pubs_Reports.
Rusmiyanto, R., Huriati, N., Fitriani, N., Tyas, N., K., Rofi’i, A., & Sari, M., N. (2023). The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Developing English Language Learner's Communication Skills. Journal on Education, 6(1), 750-757.
Sabon, S., S. (2018). Efektivitas pelatihan guru melalui pendidikan dan latihan profesi guru. Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan. 11(3).
Sandra, L. A., & Kurniawati, L., A. (2020). Differentiated instructions in teaching English for
Sari, M., N. (2021). SHAPING YOUNG LEARNERS’CHARACTER THROUGH TEACHER QUESTIONING IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES. Pendekar: Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter, 4(1), 14-19.
Sari, M., N. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions on Students’ Learning Styles on Learning English at Sma Negeri 10 Kerinci. Jurnal Pendidikan, Keguruan, dan Pengajaran, 1(1), 32-43.
Sari, M., N., Saswandi, T., Ningsih, P., E. A., Huriati, N., & Ihsan, R. (2023). Unraveling the Threads
Schindler, L., A., Burkholder, G., J., Morad, O., A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and stu- dent engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Shernoff, D., J. (2013). Optimal learning environment to promote student engagement. New
Sibagariang, D., Sihotang, H., Murniarti, E. (2021). Peran guru penggerak dalam pendidikan merdeka belajar di indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 14 (2), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.51212/jdp.v14i2.53
Singh, A. (2022). Conceptual framework on Smart Learning Environment- An Indian perspective. Revista De Educación Y Derecho, (25). https://doi.org/ doi:10.1344/REYD2022.25.36706
Singh, A., Singh, D., Sumit, C. (2024). Challenges and Suggestions to Enhance Student Engagement in Higher Education Institution. ReseacrhGate.
Skinner, E., A., & Pitzer, J., R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer.
student engagement. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
students with autism spectrum disorder. Jet Adi Buana, 5(01), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.36456/jet.v5.n01.2020.2274
Students’ Learning Outcomes on Features of Modern/Contemporary Art. International Journal of Multi Discipline Science (IJ-MDS), 1(2), 42-50.
Suardi, M. (2018). Belajar & pembelajaran. Deepublish.
Subekti, A., S., & Kurniawati, L., A. (2022). Indonesian English Teachers’ Work Engagement and Attitudes towards the Use of Instructional Technology: A Survey Study . VOLES, 6(2), 299-311. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.29408/veles.v6i2.6066
Sukardi, (2010). Metodologi Pendidikan Pendidikan; Kompetensi dan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara
Supiah. (2018). The Attitude Of Non- English Major Student In Learning English. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.32923/tarbawy.v5i1.830
Suryati, I., Ratih, K., & Maryadi, M. (2023). Teachers’ challenges in implementing.
Tanjung, P., A., & Ashadi, A. (2019). Differentiated instruction in accommodating individual
Teacher Education, 98, 103236.
teacher preparation programs and through professional development: A review. Teaching and
the private secondary school in Palembang. International Journal of Scientific & Technology
Thongsongsee, J. (2022). Exploring EFL teachers’ roles and practices in promoting student engagement. Thaites Journal, 35(2), 36-62.
Thurlow, M., L., Ysseldyke, J. E., Graden, J., & Algozzine, B. (1983). Instructional ecology for students in resource and regular education. Teacher Education and Special Education. 6, 248-254.
Tomlinson, C., A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms.
Triyanto, Haryono, B., & Handayani, R., D. (2023). Civic education teachers’ role in transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. South African Journal of Education, 43 (2), 9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43ns2a2162
Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 11(1), 1–15.
Tualaulelei, E., Burke, K., Fanshawe, M., & Cameron, C. (2022). Mapping pedagogical touchpoints: Exploring online student engagement and course design. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421990847
Uibu, K., & Kikas, E. (2014). “Authoritative and Authoritarian-inconsistent Teachers’ Preferences for Teaching Methods and Instructional Goals.” Education, 3–13 42 (1): 5–22.
Uibu, K., Salo, A., Ugaste., A. & Puttonen, H., R. (2023). Observed teaching practices interpreted from the perspective of school-based teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1900110
Wang, H., F. (2015). an survey study on English learning of non-English majors in key unviersities [Master’s Thesis, Shandong Normal University]. China National Knowledge Internet. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201502&filena me=1015600879.nh
Wang, M., and J. Fredricks. 2014. “The Reciprocal Links between School Engagement, Youth
Problem Behaviors, and School Dropout during Adolescence.” Child Development 85 (2):
722–737. doi:10.1111/cdev.12138.
Wang, M., and S. Peck. 2013. “Adolescent Educational Success and Mental Health Vary across
School Engagement Profiles.” Developmental Psychology. 49 (7): 1266–1276. doi:10.1037/
a0030028.
Wang, N., & Kang, J., P. (2015). Youzhuyu tigao daxuesheng yingyu siji kaoshi chengji de jiaoxue xingwei yanjiu [A study on teacher instructional behaviors that contribute to improving college students' English CET-4 exam scores]. Science Times. 2015(04), 173–174. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/kxsd201504153
Wang, Y. (2013). Yuanxiao huanjing dui daxuesheng xueye chengji de yingxiang yanjiu: Jiyu Guangxi Daxue de shizheng yanjiu [A study on the influence of college environment on university students' academic achievement: An empirical study based on Guangxi University, Doctoral Dissertation, Guangxi University]. China National Knowledge Internet. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201401&filena me=1013372811.nh
Widdoson, H., G. (1983). Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wu, R., H. (2021). Xinmeiti shidai daxue yingyu jiaoxue zhong de wenti fenxi [Analysis of problems in college English teaching in the new media era]. English On Campus. 2021(25), 32-33. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotalXYYY202125016.htm
Wulantari, N., P., Rachman, A., Sari, M., N., Uktolseja, L., J., & Rofi'i, A. (2023). The Role of Gamification in English Language Teaching: A Literature Review. Journal on Education, 6(1),
Xu, X., & Li, Y. (2018). Teaching Method of Tourism Curriculum Design Based on Practical Teaching Method. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri. 18(6), 3536-3542. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.6.264
York: Springer Science+Business Media.
Yulianto, A. (2019). Implementation of Peer-Teaching Learning Methods to Improve the.
Zaturrahmi. (2019). Lingkungan belajar sebagai pengelolaankelas: sebuah kajian literatur. E-Tech, 7(4), 2621-7759.
Longitudinal Association of Childhood School Engagement with Adult Educational and
Occupational Achievement: Findings from an Australian National Study.” British Educational
Research Journal. 40 (1): 102–120. doi:10.1002/berj.3031
Abiodullah, M., Dur-e-Sameen, D., & Aslam. (2020). Emotional intelligence as a predictor of teacher engagement in classroom. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(1), 127–140.
achievement in kindergarten. International Journal of Contemporary Education, 2(2), 61.
achievement motivation on students’ writing competency. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia, 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v1i0.808
Adekunle, M. (1995). English in Nigeria: Attitudes, policy and communicative realities. Bamgbose et Al (Eds.) New English: A West African Perspective Ibadan: Mosuro Publishers and Book Sellers.
Aelterman, N., M., Vansteenkiste, H., Van Keer, L., Van den Berghe, J., De Meyer, & L. Haerens. (2012). “Students’ Objectively Measured Physical Activity Levels and Engagement as a Function of Between-class and Between-student Differences in Motivation toward Physical Education.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34 (4): 457–480. doi:10.1123/jsep.34.4.457.
Ajideh, P. (2009). Autonomous Learning and Metacognitive Strategies in ESP Class.
Alghamdi, A., H. (2022). Factors affecting teaching methods among academicians in al-baha university, saudi arabia. Egyptian Journal of Educational Sciences. 2(1).
Alhirtani, N., A., K. (2020). The Use of Modern Teaching Methods in Teaching the Arabic Language at Higher Education Phase from the Point View of Arabic Language Professors--A Case of a
Ali, M., M., & Hassan, N. (2018). Defining concepts of student engagement and factors contributing to their engagement in schools. Creative Education, 9, 2161-2170. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.914157.
Anderson, A., R., Christenson, S., L., Sinclair, M., F., & Lehr, C., A. (2004). Check & connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 95–113. doi: 10.1016/j. jsp.2004.01.002
Andryani, R., Iryanah., Firdaus, I., & Maliki, B., I. (2024). Efektivitas pelatihan dan pengembangan guru dalam mencapai tujuan pendidikan yang unggul. Journal on Education, 6(3), 15851- 15862.
Anthony, L. (2018). Introducing English for specific purposes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.7251
Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. (2009). Adolescent behavioral, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: Relationship to dropout. Journal of School Health, 79(9), 408-415; 415.
Archambault, I., M. Janosz, J. Fallu, and L. Pagani. 2009. “Student Engagement and Its
Relationship with Early High School Dropout.” Journal of Adolescence. 32 (3): 651–670.
doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007
Ardila, Y., P., & Rigianti, H., A. (2023). Peran Penting dan Tantangan yang di Hadapi oleh Guru Profesional dalam Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar di Kelas. Jurnal Handayani. 14(1), 162-183.
Ayeni, A., J. (2011). Teachers’ professional development and quality assurance in Nigerian Secondary Schools, World Journal of Education, 12:143-149.
Basri, M., D. (2016). Fundamentals of Language Research Methodology. Jakarta Pusat: Gunadarma Ilmu Publisher. behavioral, cognitive, and emotional engagement among three school-age Student
Biggs, J. (2012). “What the Student Does: Teaching for Enhanced Learning.” Higher Education
Research and Development, 31(1), 39–55. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.642839.
Bondie, R., S., Dahnke, C., & Zusho, A. (2019). How does changing “One-Size-Fits-All” to
Brown, A., Lawrence, J., Basson, M., & Redmond, P. (2022). A conceptual framework to enhance student online learning and engagement in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1860912
Burić, I., & Macuka, I. (2018). Self-efficacy, emotions and work engagement among teachers: A two wave cross-lagged analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(7), 1917–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9903-9
Butler, Y., G., & Iino, M. (2005). Current Japanese reforms in English language education: The 2003 “action plan.” Language Policy, 4(1), 25–45.
CASPERSEN, J., DE LANGE, T., PRØITZ, T. S., SOLBREKKE, T. D. & STENSAKER, B. (2011) Learning about
Christenson, S., L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer Science & Business Media.
Christenson, S., L., Reschly, A., L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on
Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education: University
cohorts. Review of Higher Education and Self-Learning, 4(13), 52-62.
Collie, R., J., Martin, A., J., Papworth, B., & Ginns, P. (2016). Students’ interpersonal relationships, personal best (PB) goals, and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 65–76.
Collins, J., A. (2014). Student engagement in today’s learning environment: Engaging the
connections. New York: Routledge.
Conner, T. (2011). Academic engagement ratings and instructional preferences: Comparing
Da Luz, F., S. (2015). The relationship between teachers and students in the classroom: communicative language teaching approach and cooperative learning strategy to improve learning (Master’s Thesis). Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, United States.
Dacholfany, M., I., Nasar, I., Zulfikar, M. R., Machsunah, Y. C., Wahyuningsih, D., & Sitopu, J. W. (2023). Program Pelatihan Guru Lintas Provinsi dalam Peningkatan (3rd ed.). ASCD.
(University of Oslo, Oslo). 2847-2856.3(9), 1693–1708. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v3i9.871 362. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X188211304(6), 4613-4618.
Den Brok, P., T., Bergen, R., J., Stahl, & Brekelmans, M. (2004). “Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Control Behaviours.” Learning and Instruction. 14(4): 425–443. doi:10.1016/j. learninstruc.2004.01.004
DeVito, M. (2016). Factors Influencing Student Engagement. Unpublished Certificate of Advanced Study Thesis, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, CT. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/edl/11
differences of efl students. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching,
differentiated instruction affect teaching? Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 336-
Differentiated instruction in teaching English at Junior High School. Eduvest (Printed),
Dixson, M., D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1-13
Djamarah, & Zain, (2010). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Djamarah, Bahri, S. (1996). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineka C
Douglass, J., A., Thomson, G., & Zhao, C.-M. (2012). The learning outcomes race: the value of self-
Dudley-Evans, T. & ST. Jhons, M. J. (1998) Developments in English for Specific Purposes, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Echevarria, J., Short, D., & Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 195–211.
Education.
Education. EDU RESEARCH, 4(3), 144-156
ELF Annual Research Journal, 21(May), 130–153. https://www.academia.edu/download/62624248/ELF-Differentiated_Instructions20200331-37436-1ojowen.pdf.
Eliza, D., Sriandila, R., Fitri, D., A., N., & Yenti, S. (2022). Membangun guru yang profesional melalui pengembangan profesionalisme puru dalam penerapan profesinya. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 5362-5369. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2878
Emma, J., Vermeulen, E., J., & Volman, M., L., L. (2024). Promoting Student Engagement in Online Education: Online Learning Experiences of Dutch University Stude. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 2(9), 941–961.
Fakry Gaffar, M. (2017). Guru Sebagai Profesi. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan UPI, 5(1), 02.
Fauziningrum, E., Sari, M., N., Rahmani, S., F., Riztya, R., Syafruni, S., & Purba, P., M. (2023). Strategies Used by English Teachers in Teaching Vocabulary. Journal on Education, 6(1), 674- 679.
Felder, R., M., & Henriques, E., R. (1995). Learning and Teaching Styles in Foreign and Second Language Education. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 21–31.
Finn, J., D., & Zimmer, K., S. (2012). Student Engagement: What Is It? Why Does It Matter? In S. L. C. et Al. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Fitria, H. (2018). The influence of organizational culture and trust through the teacher performance in
Franchisca, S., Sari, M., N., Nurfitri, Nelloe, M., K., Mulyapradana, A., & Fitriani, N. (2024). The Impact of Motivation on Foreign Language Learning: A Longitudinal Study. Journal on Education. 6(2), 11082-11093.
Franklin, C., Harris, M., B., & Allen-Meares, P. (2013). The school services sourcebook: A
Fredericks, J., A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M., A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
Fredricks, J., A., Blumenfeld, P., C., & Paris, A., H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gallup, Inc. (2013). U.S. overall: Gallup student poll results. 1-6.
Goldspink, C., Winter, P., & Foster, M. (2008). Student engagement and quality pedagogy.
Gonçalves, L., L, Parker, M., Luguetti, C., & Carbinatto, M. (2020). The facilitator’s role in supporting physical education teachers’ empowerment in a professional learning community. Sport, Education and Society, 27(3):272–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1825371
Good, T. (1983). Classroom research: A decade of progress. Educational Psychologist. 18, 127-144.
Gray, J., A., & DiLoreto. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. NCPEA International Journal of Education Leadership Preparation. 11(1), 1-20.
Green, L., & Collett, K. (2021). Teaching thinking in South African schools : Selected school leaders’ perceptions. South African Journal of Education, 41(2):Art. #1893, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v41n2a1893
Gualbertus, E., Nyoman, P. N., & Made, R. (2013). The effect of differentiated instruction and
guide for school-based professionals (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. BRILL.
https://doi.org/10.11114/ijce.v2i2.4479.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987) English for Specific Purpose, ALearning Centred Approach, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
indonesia. Al-Hikmah (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pendidikan Agama Islam), 3(2), 194-202.
International Education Studies, 8(9), 107-112. Retrieved from http://210.48.222.80/proxy.pac/scholarly-journals/comparison-between-effect-cooperative-learning/docview/1773226319/se-2?accountid=44024
Islam, M. (2014). The differences and similarities between English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and English for General Purposes (EGP) teachers. Journal of Research (Humanities), 68, 67-75.
Ismail, S. (2019). Impact of differentiated instruction on the writing process of ESL learners.
Issues in Language Planning, 22(1-2), 199-224. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741209
Jang, H., E. Kim, and J. Reeve. 2016. “Why Students Become More Engaged or More Disengaged
during the Semester: A Self-determination Theory Dual-process Model.” Learning and
Instruction. 43: 27–38. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002.
Jiang, Y., L. (2021). POA lilun guanzhao xia daxue yingyu ketang ruhe tigao xuesheng canyudu de yanjiu [A study on how to improve student engagement in college English classroom from the perspective of POA theory]. In Lianghua jiaoxue moshi zai yingyongxing daxue rencai peiyang zhong de tan jiu he shijian zhuanti lunwenji [Exploration and practice of the 'integration of two disciplines' teaching Model in talent cultivation of applied universities: Collection of dpecial papers] (pp. 74- 77). Beijing: Běijīng Kējì Dàxué Tiānjīn Xuéyuàn. http://doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2021.044679
Kotob, M., & Arnouss, D. (2019). Differentiated instruction: The effect on learner’s.
Krismiyati, K., & Yulia, H. (2022). The relationship between student engagement and their perception of success in online learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 29(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v29i1.53966
KUALITAS PEMBELAJARAN. Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian
Kuh, G., D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
Kuh, G., D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research. 141(1), 5-20.
Le, M., D., Nguyen, H., T. M., & Burns, A. (2021). English Primary Teacher Agency in Implementing Teaching Methods in Response to Language Policy Reform: A Vietnamese Case Study. Current
Literature and Linguistics, 6(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v6i2.9941
Liu, J., C. (2020). Yingyongxing benke yuanxiao daxue yingyu siji tongguolv tisheng celue tanxi: Yi Guangdong Dongruan Xueyuan dianzi shangwu zhuanye weili [Analysis of strategies for improving the pass rate of college English CET-4 in applied undergraduate Institutions: A case study of the e-commerce major at Donghua University, Guangdong]. Journal of Hunan Mass Media Vocational and Technical College. 20(2), 109–112. http://doi.org/10.16261/j.cnki.cn43- 1370/z.2020.02.028
Liu, M., Noordin, N., Ismail, L., & Abdrahim, N., A. (2023). Relationship between Student Engagement and Academic Achievement in College English Education for Non-English Majors in China. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 22(8), 203-2323. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.8.12
Major, C., H. (2015). Teaching online: A guide to theory, research, and practice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Mäkinen, M. (2013). Becoming engaged in inclusive practices: Narrative reflections on teaching as descriptors of teachers’ work engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.005
Martin, L. (2020). Foundations for good practice: The student experience of online learning in Australian higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). https://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/student-experience-of- online-learning-in-australian-he-during-covid-19.pdf?v=1606442611
Masyarakat, 4(2), 4513-4524.
Mertens, D., M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Miles, M., B., Huberman, A., M., & Saldana, J. C. (2021). Qualitizing data. The Routledge reviewer’s guide to mixed method analysis. 141-150.
missing catalyst of lasting instructional reform. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
Mohammadjani, F., & Tonkaboni, F. (2015). A Comparison between the Effect of Cooperative Learning Teaching Method and Lecture Teaching Method on Students' Learning and Satisfaction Level.
Murniarti, E. (2021). Analisis Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Pada Pembelajaran Daring Dimasa Pandemi Covid-19. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 1418-1427.
Murtafiah, N., H. (2022). Manajemen Pengendalian Kinerja Pendidik dalam Meningkatkan Mutu
Nguyen, T., M. Cannata, & J. Miller. (2018). “Understanding Student Behavioral Engagement:
Importance of Student Interaction with Peers and Teachers.” The Journal of Educational
Research. 111 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1080/00220671.2016.1220359.
Non-major. Dictionary Cambridge. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/non-major
of Time: An Analysis of Literature on Strategies for Teaching Simple Past Tense in Higher
Olson, A., L., & Peterson, R., L. (2015). Student Engagement, Strategy Brief. Lincoln, NE: Student Engagement Project, University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the Nebraska Department of Education. http://k12engagement.unl.edu/student-engagement
Pedler, M., Yeigh, T., & Hudson, S. (2020). The Teachers’ Role in Student Engagement: A Review. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45 (3). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n3.4
Pembelajaran Pada Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK),
Perry, K., E., Donohue, K., M., & Weinstein, R., S. (2007). “Teaching Practices and the Promotion of Achievement and Adjustment in First Grade.” Journal of School Psychology, 45 (3): 269–292. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.02.005.
Pharis, T., Wu, E., Sullivan, S., & Moore, L. (2019). Improving Teacher Quality: Professional Development Implications from Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Implementation in Rural Kentucky High Schools. Educational Research Quarterly. 42(3).
Poom-Valickis, K., Saarits, I., Sikka, H., Talts, L., & Veisson, M. (2013). Professional education of teachers’ problems and perspectives. The Estonian case. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 3:15– 23.
Prater, M. A. (1992). Increasing time-on-task in the classroom: Suggestions for improving the amount of time learners spendin on-task behaviors. Intervention in School and Clinic. 28(1), 22-27.
Prawiyogi, A., G., Sadiah, T., L., Purwanugraha, A., & Elisa, P., N. (2021). Penggunaan Media Big Book untuk Menumbuhkan Minat Baca Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicude, 5 (1), 446-452. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.787
Premier University. International Education Studies, 13(1), 32-41. Retrieved from http://210.48.222.80/proxy.pac/scholarly-journals/use-modern-teaching-methods-arabic-language-at/docview/2396851577/se-2?accountid=44024
Purnama, Y. (2022). The Use Google Translate by Islamic Education Departement Students. SINOMICS, 1(3).
Quality – perspectives on learning outcomes and their operationalisations and measurement
Quin, D. (2017). “Longitudinal and Contextual Associations between Teacher–student
Relationships and Student Engagement.” Review of Educational Research 87 (2): 345–387.
doi:10.3102/0034654316669434.
Rahayu, A., S. (2018). Engaging the students with styles in EFL perspectives. CELTIC: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature & Linguistics, 3(1), 15–29. Retrieved from https://www.education.sa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net691/f/student_engagement_and_quali ty_pedagogy.pdf?v=1457314100
Ramana, P., V., Hv, R., K., Lakshmilavanya, P., Sunalini, K., K., Pathak, P., Mallick, R., & Priya, C. (2024), The Impact Of English Language Learning Strategies On Student Success In Higher Education, Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 8557 - 8563. Doi: 10.53555/kuey.v30i5.4416
reported gains in large research universities, Higher Education, 64, pp. 317–33
Research.7(7), 82-86
Risdiany, H. (2021). Pengembangan profesionalisme guru dalam mewujudkan kualitas pendidikan di.
Robinson, C., C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101-109.
Rolf, E. (2021). Teachers as designers: Analyses of pedagogical patterns and their use. PhD dissertation. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University. Available at https://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:1602928/FULLTEXT0 1.pdf. Accessed 31 December 2023.
Romijn, B. R., Slot, P. L., & Leseman, P. P. (2021). Increasing teachers’ intercultural competences in
Rothstein, J. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 175–214. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.175
Rumberger, R., W., & Lim, S., A. (2008). Why Students Drop Out of School: A Review of 25 Years of
Research. Santa Barbara: California Dropout Research Project. http://cdrp.ucsb.edu/Dropouts/
Pubs_Reports.
Rusmiyanto, R., Huriati, N., Fitriani, N., Tyas, N., K., Rofi’i, A., & Sari, M., N. (2023). The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Developing English Language Learner's Communication Skills. Journal on Education, 6(1), 750-757.
Sabon, S., S. (2018). Efektivitas pelatihan guru melalui pendidikan dan latihan profesi guru. Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan. 11(3).
Sandra, L. A., & Kurniawati, L., A. (2020). Differentiated instructions in teaching English for
Sari, M., N. (2021). SHAPING YOUNG LEARNERS’CHARACTER THROUGH TEACHER QUESTIONING IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES. Pendekar: Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter, 4(1), 14-19.
Sari, M., N. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions on Students’ Learning Styles on Learning English at Sma Negeri 10 Kerinci. Jurnal Pendidikan, Keguruan, dan Pengajaran, 1(1), 32-43.
Sari, M., N., Saswandi, T., Ningsih, P., E. A., Huriati, N., & Ihsan, R. (2023). Unraveling the Threads
Schindler, L., A., Burkholder, G., J., Morad, O., A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and stu- dent engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Shernoff, D., J. (2013). Optimal learning environment to promote student engagement. New
Sibagariang, D., Sihotang, H., Murniarti, E. (2021). Peran guru penggerak dalam pendidikan merdeka belajar di indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 14 (2), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.51212/jdp.v14i2.53
Singh, A. (2022). Conceptual framework on Smart Learning Environment- An Indian perspective. Revista De Educación Y Derecho, (25). https://doi.org/ doi:10.1344/REYD2022.25.36706
Singh, A., Singh, D., Sumit, C. (2024). Challenges and Suggestions to Enhance Student Engagement in Higher Education Institution. ReseacrhGate.
Skinner, E., A., & Pitzer, J., R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Springer.
student engagement. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
students with autism spectrum disorder. Jet Adi Buana, 5(01), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.36456/jet.v5.n01.2020.2274
Students’ Learning Outcomes on Features of Modern/Contemporary Art. International Journal of Multi Discipline Science (IJ-MDS), 1(2), 42-50.
Suardi, M. (2018). Belajar & pembelajaran. Deepublish.
Subekti, A., S., & Kurniawati, L., A. (2022). Indonesian English Teachers’ Work Engagement and Attitudes towards the Use of Instructional Technology: A Survey Study . VOLES, 6(2), 299-311. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.29408/veles.v6i2.6066
Sukardi, (2010). Metodologi Pendidikan Pendidikan; Kompetensi dan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara
Supiah. (2018). The Attitude Of Non- English Major Student In Learning English. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.32923/tarbawy.v5i1.830
Suryati, I., Ratih, K., & Maryadi, M. (2023). Teachers’ challenges in implementing.
Tanjung, P., A., & Ashadi, A. (2019). Differentiated instruction in accommodating individual
Teacher Education, 98, 103236.
teacher preparation programs and through professional development: A review. Teaching and
the private secondary school in Palembang. International Journal of Scientific & Technology
Thongsongsee, J. (2022). Exploring EFL teachers’ roles and practices in promoting student engagement. Thaites Journal, 35(2), 36-62.
Thurlow, M., L., Ysseldyke, J. E., Graden, J., & Algozzine, B. (1983). Instructional ecology for students in resource and regular education. Teacher Education and Special Education. 6, 248-254.
Tomlinson, C., A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms.
Triyanto, Haryono, B., & Handayani, R., D. (2023). Civic education teachers’ role in transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. South African Journal of Education, 43 (2), 9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43ns2a2162
Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The Higher Education Academy, 11(1), 1–15.
Tualaulelei, E., Burke, K., Fanshawe, M., & Cameron, C. (2022). Mapping pedagogical touchpoints: Exploring online student engagement and course design. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421990847
Uibu, K., & Kikas, E. (2014). “Authoritative and Authoritarian-inconsistent Teachers’ Preferences for Teaching Methods and Instructional Goals.” Education, 3–13 42 (1): 5–22.
Uibu, K., Salo, A., Ugaste., A. & Puttonen, H., R. (2023). Observed teaching practices interpreted from the perspective of school-based teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1900110
Wang, H., F. (2015). an survey study on English learning of non-English majors in key unviersities [Master’s Thesis, Shandong Normal University]. China National Knowledge Internet. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201502&filena me=1015600879.nh
Wang, M., and J. Fredricks. 2014. “The Reciprocal Links between School Engagement, Youth
Problem Behaviors, and School Dropout during Adolescence.” Child Development 85 (2):
722–737. doi:10.1111/cdev.12138.
Wang, M., and S. Peck. 2013. “Adolescent Educational Success and Mental Health Vary across
School Engagement Profiles.” Developmental Psychology. 49 (7): 1266–1276. doi:10.1037/
a0030028.
Wang, N., & Kang, J., P. (2015). Youzhuyu tigao daxuesheng yingyu siji kaoshi chengji de jiaoxue xingwei yanjiu [A study on teacher instructional behaviors that contribute to improving college students' English CET-4 exam scores]. Science Times. 2015(04), 173–174. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/kxsd201504153
Wang, Y. (2013). Yuanxiao huanjing dui daxuesheng xueye chengji de yingxiang yanjiu: Jiyu Guangxi Daxue de shizheng yanjiu [A study on the influence of college environment on university students' academic achievement: An empirical study based on Guangxi University, Doctoral Dissertation, Guangxi University]. China National Knowledge Internet. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201401&filena me=1013372811.nh
Widdoson, H., G. (1983). Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wu, R., H. (2021). Xinmeiti shidai daxue yingyu jiaoxue zhong de wenti fenxi [Analysis of problems in college English teaching in the new media era]. English On Campus. 2021(25), 32-33. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotalXYYY202125016.htm
Wulantari, N., P., Rachman, A., Sari, M., N., Uktolseja, L., J., & Rofi'i, A. (2023). The Role of Gamification in English Language Teaching: A Literature Review. Journal on Education, 6(1),
Xu, X., & Li, Y. (2018). Teaching Method of Tourism Curriculum Design Based on Practical Teaching Method. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri. 18(6), 3536-3542. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.6.264
York: Springer Science+Business Media.
Yulianto, A. (2019). Implementation of Peer-Teaching Learning Methods to Improve the.
Zaturrahmi. (2019). Lingkungan belajar sebagai pengelolaankelas: sebuah kajian literatur. E-Tech, 7(4), 2621-7759.
Published
2024-12-06
Section
Research
Copyright (c) 2024 Ratih Pertiwi, Titin Rahmiatin Rahim, Muflihun Muflihun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Tamaddun journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain the copyright and grant Tamaddun the right of first publication. The work will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits others to share the work with proper acknowledgment of the authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into additional non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of their work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or including it in a book), provided that the initial publication in this journal is acknowledged.
3. Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) before and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the published work.
